Discuz! Board 首页 资讯 查看内容

资讯

订阅

British scholar Raymond Williams

2023-10-18| 来源:互联网| 查看: 317| 评论: 0

摘要: Noonewoulddenythatfilmisanart,butwhatisfilmandwhatisart?Atfirstglance,youmaythinkthatsuchaproblemisquiteminor.Whohasn'tseenamovieyet,howcouldtheynotevenknowwhatitis?Withourexperien.........
No one would deny that film is an art, but what is film and what is art? At first glance, you may think that such a problem is quite minor. Who hasn't seen a movie yet, how could they not even know what it is? With our experience of watching movies and reading CDs alone, we can tell the story in detail.



And for the question of what art is, as long as one is proficient in art theory or a certain art category of theory, they can definitely come up with some ideas. But is the problem really that simple?





The numerous works on film theory and art theory may serve as evidence, but those who do not like theory always cite Dr. Faust's words in Goethe's "Faust" to refute that theory is gray.



Spies in Disguise Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone eraserhead So let's first assume that those theories are just making sense. How can we face how movies with a history of only over a hundred years, without any theory, enter the palace of art from the grand land of "juggling"?





The term "art" in English is mainly represented by "art", and the initial meaning of art was to refer to various different technologies (skills).



According to British scholar Raymond Williams, the meaning of the term did not change until the late 18th and early 19th centuries, gradually forming the commonly adopted meaning of "generally related to (creative) and (imaginative)".
分享至 : QQ空间

10 人收藏


鲜花

握手

雷人

路过

鸡蛋

收藏

邀请

上一篇:暂无
已有 0 人参与

会员评论

关于本站/服务条款/广告服务/法律咨询/求职招聘/公益事业/客服中心
Copyright ◎2015-2020 凌海新媒体版权所有 ALL Rights Reserved.
Powered by 凌海新媒体 X1.0